USPTO serial 78431489
QUALITY OF HIRE FILTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3097387Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUALITY OF HIRE FILTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
ROSWELL, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Nichols Matthews
Julie Nichols Matthews WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON225 W WACKER DR STE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1229UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Pre-employment testing, assessment and screening of candidates and applicants for jobs focusing on cognitive ability, psychological, situational judgment, skills, intelligence, and behavioral tests to determine suitability, likelihood of success and strengths and weaknesses; employee testing and assessment services focusing on cognitive ability, psychological, situational judgment, skills, intelligence, and behavioral tests to determine suitability, likelihood of success and strengths and weaknesses; employment counseling and recruiting services, namely, interviewing and personnel placement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ePredix, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ePredix, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ePredix, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PREVISOR INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named QUALITY OF HIRE FILTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |