Drawing for SPACE FOR LIVING

USPTO serial 78439166

SPACE FOR LIVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPACE FOR LIVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Silverman, Esq.

David M. Silverman, Esq. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Suite 200Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded videotapes, DVDs and CDs concerning home furnishing.ACTIVE—
016Print and on-line publications concerning home furnishing, namely books, magazines, pamphlets, brochures, catalogues and newsletters.ACTIVE—
020Line of furniture, namely furniture for the kitchen, bedroom, bathroom, living room, dining room, rec room, office, outdoors; house and home furnishings, namely, furniture, comprising tables, chairs, sofas, couches, beds, shelves, plastic modular storage units, wood modular storage units, modular wall units, bed frames, headboards, stools, ottomans, sectional seating benches, desks, credenzas, sideboards, chests, cupboards, cabinets, bar cabinets, dressers, vanities, bookcases, tea carts, serving trolleys, record player benches, corner cupboards, storage cabinets, storage boxes made of plastic, storage boxes made of wood, hat racks, coat racks, night stands, wardrobes, cribs, cradles, bunk beds, bunk bed ladders, pedestals, magazine stands and shoe stands; mirrors; mattresses, crib mattresses, pillows and cushions; curtain rods; carpenters' benches,closet accessories, namely, clothes bars, and clothes hangers, all specifically in the nature of furnitureACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going television program in the field of home furnishing; production of a television series and recorded audiovisual performances on videotape, DVD and CD; distribution of television programs for others.ACTIVE—
042Provision of information concerning home furnishing via an Internet website; home furnishing services, namely interior decorating services provided via an Internet website.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 23, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 23, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance