Drawing for OUTSOURCE TELECOM

USPTO serial 78443823

OUTSOURCE TELECOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OUTSOURCE TELECOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren L. Dranit

Warren L. Dranit Spaulding McCullough & Tansil LLPP. O. Box 1867Santa Rosa, CA 95402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Personnel services, namely technical staffing and recruitingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 13, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 12, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 31, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 17, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance