Drawing for MOBILTICKET

USPTO serial 78461638

MOBILTICKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILTICKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arnold S. Weintraub

ARNOLD S WEINTRAUB THE WEINTRAUB GROUP32000 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 240FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334-1569UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic transmission of data to a merchant in the nature of a machine readable code or display representing a transaction receipt which is displayed on a mobile device display screenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 26, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 26, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 2, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance