USPTO serial 78474003
CLOUDSCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOUDSCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino
ALEXANDER TOGNINO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPN CASTLE DRINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGARMONK, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND USER INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |