USPTO serial 78485733
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CA
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CA
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E BLAIR FORREST
E BLAIR FORREST PUSHOR MITCHELL LAWY1665 ELLIS ST 3RD FLKELOWNA, BC V1Y 2B3CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wireless communication devices, namely, personal hearing devices in the nature of assistive listening devices not for medical purposes; earphones; audio speakers; integrated circuits for hearing aids and audiological devices; integrated circuits for digital signal processing; software for digital signal processing; equipment, devices, and software which assist, enable, or enhance telecommunications, namely, computer hardware and software programs to process and provide audio signals; software for monitoring the function of hearing aids and audiological devices for medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | wireless communication devices, namely, personal hearing devices in the nature of assistive listening devices for medical purposes; hearing aids and assistive listening devices for hearing impaired individuals; personal hearing devices in the nature of medical hearing instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | printed materials, namely, newsletters, pamphlets, brochures, instruction sheets, booklets, and binders of loose sheets, all of an informative nature in relation to audiology, audiological services and audiological devices; teaching materials, namely, newsletters, pamphlets, brochures, instruction sheets, booklets, and binders of loose sheets, all of an informative nature in the field of audiology and telecommunications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | assisting others in establishing and operating businesses which provide retail hearing aid and related audiological product; business consulting and business management services relating to audiology, audiological services and audiological devices; business consulting and business management services relating to audiology, audiological services and audiological devices; distributorship services relating to printed materials in the field of audiology, audiological services and audiological devices, namely, distributorship in the field of printed materials and teaching materials of others to retailers, namely, newsletters, pamphlets, brochures, instruction sheets, booklets and binders of loose sheets, all of an informative nature in the field of audiology and telecommunications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | scientific research services excluding advertising and media research services; conducting scientific research in the audiology field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | hearing aid and audiological device fitting services; audiology services, namely, provision of audiology and hearing care diagnostic and treatment services; diagnostic and identification services, namely, developing and overseeing screening programs to detect and prevent hearing impairment; assessment and diagnosis services, namely, administration and interpretation of behavioral, electroacoustic, and electrophysiological measures of the peripheral and central auditory systems and vestibular system; habilitative and rehabilitation services, namely, providing a full range of habilitative and rehabilitative services to those with hearing impairment and information regarding the medical treatment of hearing impairment to family members, professionals and the general public; selection, prescription, fitting, dispensing and evaluating amplification devices, namely, hearing aids and assistive devices for both normal and hearing impaired individuals; providing counseling services regarding the effects of hearing loss on communication and psychosocial status in personal, social and vocational arenas, and speech and hearing therapy strategies for improving communication; providing otoscopic examinations, earwax removal and ear impressions for the purposes of making custom hearing aids and earmolds; assessing persons with tinnitus; providing information and instruction to persons with tinnitus on strategies and techniques for managing their symptoms; diagnosis of hearing impairment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |