USPTO serial 78486827
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Lantz
JENNIFER M LANTZ MACPHERSON KWOK CHEN & HEID LLP2033 GATEWAY PL STE 400SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded CD's, DVD's, video tapes, and audio tapes featuring physical fitness and exercise instruction | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely books, booklets, and manuals in the field of physical fitness, exercise, and general health | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Physical fitness instruction | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |