Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78507936?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78507936. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns I WANT TO BE PAID?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78507936, the listed owner(s) include: Eichner, Kenneth D..

What is USPTO serial number 78507936?

Serial number 78507936 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark I WANT TO BE PAID. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of I WANT TO BE PAID?

I WANT TO BE PAID (78507936) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover I WANT TO BE PAID?

The public record lists International Classes: 035. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78507936

I WANT TO BE PAID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Oct 28, 2004
Status date: Apr 7, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: CLARKE, NANCY
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I WANT TO BE PAID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Eichner, Kenneth D.
Houston, TX
Other trademarks owned by Eichner, Kenneth D.

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
035	Software to keep maintain current and past due accounts receivable, customer list, clients list, call results, credit bureau reporting, letter reporting, Credit Card, ACH and Checks by Phone, and all lawsuit related scheduling	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 7, 2008	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Jan 15, 2008	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Dec 11, 2007	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Sep 19, 2007	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Aug 7, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Aug 7, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 7, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 21, 2006	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Apr 28, 2006	PGRR	PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED	—
Apr 14, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 28, 2006	PETL	COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER	—
Mar 28, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 28, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2006	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Feb 3, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 3, 2006	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Feb 3, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 3, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2005	GPRA	PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 7, 2005	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 2, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 7, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—