USPTO serial 78513004
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Aliso Viejo, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Dergosits
MICHAEL E DERGOSITS DERGOSITS & NOAH LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CENTERSUITE 410SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable ring tones, video content, audio content, images, graphics and music via the Internet, wired and wireless networks for use with wireless and handheld devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2005 |
| 038 | Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, graphics, video content and audio content via the internet, wired and wireless networks to wireless and handheld devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |