Drawing for CLEARWATER ANALYTICS

USPTO serial 78515833

CLEARWATER ANALYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3317114Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CLEARWATER ANALYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Monitoring and reporting of accounting, compliance, performance and risk data for investment assets held at one or more custody/safekeeping locationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 21, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 14, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 29, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 14, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 7, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance