Drawing for ORLEEN WEB DEALING TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78516871

ORLEEN WEB DEALING TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ORLEEN WEB DEALING TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products, eau de perfume, liquid perfumes, perfumes, perfume oils, perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations, bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes, body and beauty care cosmetics, cleansing creams (cosmetic), cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes, concealer for cosmetic purposes (body and face), cosmetic creams, cosmetic creams for skin care, cosmetic oils, cosmetic oils for the epidermis, cosmetic preparations for skin renewal, cosmetic preparations for body care, cosmetic soaps, cosmetic sun protecting preparations, face creams for cosmetic use, foundation for cosmetic use (face lotion and cream), perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations, exfoliants for skin (body and face), non-medicated skin care preparations, non-medicated skin creams, skin clarifiers, skin cleansers, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing lotions, skin conditioners, skin creams, skin creams in liquid and solid form, skin lighteners, skin lightening creams, skin lotions, skin masks, skin moisturizers, skin moisturizer masks, skin soaps, skin toners, skin whitening creams, skin whitening preparations, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, conditioners (for hair care), hair care creams, hair care lotions, hair care preparations, hair oils, hair rinses (shampoo and conditioner), hair shampoo, bath soaps in liquid - solid - or gel form, body cream soaps, cosmetic soaps, cream soaps, disinfecting perfumed soaps, hand soaps, liquid soaps (for hands, face and body), medicated soaps, perfumed soaps, skin soaps, soaps (for whitening and lightening the skin), soaps for body care, compacts containing make-ups, eyes makeup, makeup foundations, makeup removing preparations, makeup pencils, makeup powders, makeup products (for the face and body), makeup removers, make-up removing milk - gel - lotions - and creams, make up removing milks.ACTIVEOct 15, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance