USPTO serial 78528317
BIDDEPOSIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIDDEPOSIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Silver Spring, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES; INTERNET AUCTION SERVICES; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT AND DEPOSIT SERVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF DEPOSITS, BILL PAYMENTS AND DATA; CHECKING ACCOUNT SERVICES, SAVINGS ACCOUNT SERVICES; LETTERS OF CREDIT; ATM SERVICES, CREDIT AND DEBIT CARD SERVICES; AUTOMATED CLEARINGHOUSE FUNDING SERVICES; PROVIDING ESCROW ACCOUNT SERVICES; BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS BILLING SERVICES; BILLING-TO-BUSINESS PAYMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |