USPTO serial 78537032
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Johnston
WILLIAM A JOHNSTON CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP1400 MCDONALD INVESTMENT CTR 800 SUPECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land and marine vehicles, namely motorized wheeled vehicles for use on land which are also capable of travel on water; amphibious vehicles; vehicle safety seats for children; fitted vehicle covers; loose covers for vehicles; seat covers for vehicles; replacement parts, fittings, and accessories for vehicles, namely air bags (safety devices for vehicles), air pumps for vehicles, anti-theft alarms for vehicles, sun blinds, tyres, luggage nets for vehicles, anti-skid chains, headrests for vehicle seats, wheels for vehicles, roll bars, tonneau covers, biminis (being soft tops for cars), removeable hard roofs for cars and fabric roofs for cars, windscreen wipers, hoods for vehicle engines, horns for vehicles, doors for vehicles, direction signals for vehicles, anti-dazzle devices for vehicles (except for lamp fittings), rearview mirrors for vehicles, bumpers for vehicles, bodies for vehicles, chassis for vehicles, windscreens for vehicles, steering wheels for vehicles, seats for vehicles, running boards for vehicles, windows for vehicles, torsion bars for vehicles, hoods for vehicles, security harness for vehicle seats; winches being parts of land vehicles; anti-theft alarms for vehicles; children's car safety seats | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely swimwear, beachwear, shorts, trousers, sweatshirts, t-shirts; sleeveless vest jackets and waistcoats; ski wear, wetsuits, wetsuits for waterskiing; body warmers namely wind resistant jackets; gilets, namely sleeveless quilted jackets; jackets; fleece jackets; underwear; ties; gloves; socks; footwear, namely sandals, sports shoes, trainers, slippers, and deck shoes; headgear, namely hats, caps, baseball caps; belts; safety clothing for leisure use, namely reflective jackets; waterproof clothing, namely anoraks, coats, foul weather gear; waterproof jackets and trousers; windcheaters; pullovers; scarves; sun visors; arm bands, bandanas, sarongs, sweat bands, detachable hoods | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toy vehicles, namely, radio controlled toy vehicles, slot racing cars, and electrically operated toy vehicles; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; collector model vehicles, fine scale model vehicles; model vehicles; radio controlled toy vehicles; toy model hobby craft kits; plastic models being toys; bath toys; model vehicles made of foam; inflatable model vehicles; toy vehicles; parts and fittings for toy vehicles; handheld electronic gaming hardware, handheld self-contained computer games equipment; bags adapted to carry sports implements; sports bags adapted or shaped to contain specific sports apparatus; waterski bags, wakeboard bags, surfboard bags; scuba flippers; beach balls; flying discs being toys | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |