USPTO serial 78554729
WITCH DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WITCH DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
MERCHANT & GOULD PC3200 IDS CTR 80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Herbal juices featuring herbal extracts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |