CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MICROMAN

USPTO serial 78573646

MICROMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph W. Price

JOSEPH W PRICE SNELL & WILMER LLP600 ANTON BLVD STE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video animation, cartoons, anime and video game software recorded on electronically readable medium, namely video tapes, DVDs, CD ROMs, memory sticks and semiconductor memory chips including solid state pluggable memory chips; and downloadable computer game softwareACTIVE—
016Printed materials, namely comic books and magazines, posters, trading cards and booklets all featuring stories in illustrated form, graphic novels, decals, notebooks, binders, plastic and paper bags and boxes for packaging and written instruction sheets for use with computer and video based gamesACTIVE—
041Entertainment, namely, a series of television programs featuring live action characters and animated characters; entertainment, namely a continuing animated and live action show distributed over television, satellite, video and movie media; entertainment, namely, a series of television programs featuring cartoons and anime, and online video computer gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance