Drawing for E TOO

USPTO serial 78580720

E TOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E TOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALEXANDRA NICHOLSON, ESQ. and DEIRDRE DAVIS, ESQ.

ALEXANDRA NICHOLSON, ESQ. and DEIRDRE DAVIS, ESQ. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1633 BROADWAY 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035modeling agency servicesACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction and training in the field of fashion modeling; modeling for artists and arranging fashion modeling contests and providing online information in the field of fashion modelingACTIVE—
044providing online information in the field of beautyACTIVE—
045providing online information in the field of fashionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 4, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 31, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 5, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 10, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance