USPTO serial 78584697
LE CHEVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LE CHEVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL F. ZENDEL
LADAS & PARRY LLP26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, bathing suits, belts, neckties, clothing for gymnastics, namely, leotards, sweat pants, sweatshirt, tracksuit, crop top, leggings, Bermudas, jodhpurs, shorts, trunks, jacket;clothing of imitation of leather, namely, jackets, pants, single-breasted jacket, double-breasted jacket, culottes, flares, jodhpurs, crop top, leggings, overalls, shorts, slacks, trousers, trunks,overcoat, trench coat, knickerbockers, vest; clothing of leather, namely, jackets, pants, single-breasted jacket, double-breasted jacket, culottes, flares, jodhpurs, crop top, leggings, overalls, shorts, slacks, trousers, trunks, overcoat, trench coat knickerbockers, vest; coats, masquerade costumes, dressing gowns, gloves, hosiery, jackets, jerseys, jumpers, knitwear, namely, knit shirts, Bermudas, culottes, dungarees flares, knickerbockers, knickers, panties, shorts, slacks, trunks, vest, single-breasted jacket, double-breasted jacket, blouse, nightgown, turtleneck,cardigan, bathrobe, kilt, sweatshirt, tracksuit, sweat pants, overcoat, brief skirt, underpants; layettes, leggings, overalls, pants, pullovers, pajamas, scarves, shirts, skirts, suits, sweaters, t-shirts, trousers, underclothes, underwear, uniforms, vests; footwear, namely, shoes, socks, boots, sandals; and headwear, namely, caps, hats, miters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |