Drawing for SPORTSEEKER

USPTO serial 78586808

SPORTSEEKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORTSEEKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah J. Peckham

Deborah J. Peckham K&L Gates LLPOne Lincoln StreetState Street Financial CEnterBOSTON, MA 02111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online, non-downloadable television programs, videos, films, books, websites, information and computer games in the field of music, comedy, politics, culture and sports via a global computer network and via computer enhanced telephones and personal digital assistantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 23, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 3, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 3, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 4, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance