USPTO serial 78591138
OPT IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPT IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen Lesavich, PhD
STEPHEN LESAVICH PHD LESAVICH HIGH-TECH LAW GROUP PC39 S LASALLE ST STE 325CHICAGO, IL 60603-1601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software, namely, computer software for text messaging | ACTIVE | May 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |