USPTO serial 78591609
TRUPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3363211Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRUPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Software Cellular Network Limited
Kent, GB
Software Cellular Network Limited
Kent, GB
Software Cellular Network Limited
Kent, GB
Canary Wharf, London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh Ann Lindquist
Leigh Ann Lindquist SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications systems comprised of computer software for transmitting voice and data over the internet using voice over internet protocol (VOIP) technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2005 |
| 038 | Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Software Cellular Network Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Software Cellular Network Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Software Cellular Network Limited
- Other trademarks owned by TRUPHONE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named TRUPHONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 1, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |