Drawing for OLAKAI

USPTO serial 78593810

OLAKAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLAKAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Sommer

John R. Sommer John R. Sommer, Attorney-at-Law17426 Daimler StreetIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; clothing, namely surfwear, t-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, rain coats, rain trousers, rain suits, wind resistant jackets, breakers, parkas, vests, anoraks, ski bibs, gloves, mittens, underwear, socks, ski suits, gaiters, belts, skirts, shorts, pants, trousers, wet suits for water-skiing, drysuits, water ski suits, rash guards, swim trunks, swim wear, and water socksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 2, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 29, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 22, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 19, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance