Drawing for PARIS BAGUETTE

USPTO serial 78598734

PARIS BAGUETTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARIS BAGUETTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James H. Walters

JAMES H WALTERS PATENTTM.USPO BOX 82788PORTLAND, OR 97282-0788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Sandwiches; Toast; Biscuits; Ice cream; Cakes; Bean jam buns; Bread; Green tea; Coffee; Coffee-based beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 22, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 22, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 11, 2007CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 10, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 18, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 23, 2006UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Jun 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance