USPTO serial 78617441
CHEZ CLEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3616060Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEZ CLEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75009 PARIS, FR
75009 PARIS, FR
75009 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
PETER COUSINS GIBNEY ANTHONY & FLAHERTY LLP665 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, perfumes, ethereal oils, namely, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics and hair lotions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, books in the field of restaurant services; photographs, stationery, typewriters, office requisites, namely, desk blotter, paper hole punch, staplers, erasers; printing type, printing blocks; paper, namely, notebook paper, art paper, craft paper, bond paper, and copy paper; cardboard, boxes of cardboard or paper; posters, photo albums, note cards, newspapers, prospectuses and pamphlets in the field of restaurant services, calendars; graphic prints; face towels of paper, and table linen of paper | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Umbrellas, parasols and canes; textile net bags for shopping, and leather shopping bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, goblets, mugs, cups, bowls, pots, cooking pans, serving platters, dishes, oil and vinegar cruet sets, oil and vinegar bottles sold empty, pepper pots, salt cellars, cocktail stirrers, trays; decanters, cruets not of precious metal, cutting boards for the kitchen, soup bowls, napkin holders, napkin rings not of precious metal, fondue sets comprised primarily of fondue cooking skewers, containers not of precious metal or coated therewith for household use; non-electric household containers, not made of precious metal nor of metal-plated; porcelain ware, namely, jars for jams and jellies, mugs, flower pots; earthenware, namely, plates, dishes, drinking glasses, bowls, cups, mugs; bottles, sold empty; beverage glassware, serving platters, cups, saucers, mugs, bowls, plates, domestic egg holders not of precious metal, coffee cups and saucers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Cotton fabric, felt and non-woven textile fabrics; bed blankets; table blankets, namely, table mats not of paper; bed linen; household linen; table linen; and bath linen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Restaurants, bar services, food and drinking catering | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PJB HOLDING
- Other trademarks owned by PJB HOLDING
- Other trademarks owned by PJB HOLDING
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHEZ CLEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |