CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PYTHON

USPTO serial 78622464

PYTHON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PYTHON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Bourque

Daniel J. Bourque BOURQUE AND ASSOCIATES835 HANOVER ST STE 301MANCHESTER, NH 03104-5401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal goods for use in drilling and completing oil and gas wells and in the production of oil and gas from wells, namely manually operated valves, risers, riser connectors, pipeline connectors, jumper connectors, metal to metal seals, high pressure seals, geothermal wellheads, subsea connectors and wellhead connectorsACTIVE—
007Goods for use in drilling and completing oil and gas wells and in the production of oil and gas from wells, namely, wellheads, Christmas trees, and mechanically operated valves, namely, wellhead valves and Christmas tree valvesACTIVE—
037Construction, installation and maintenance services relating to oil and gas well structuresACTIVE—
042Design services for others relating to oil and gas well structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 15, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 1, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance