Drawing for SCIENTIGO

USPTO serial 78624931

SCIENTIGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCIENTIGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tracy-Gene G. Durkin

Tracy-Gene G. Durkin STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.1100 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software in the field of knowledge management for creating searchable databases of information and data; computer software in the field of knowledge management for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; computer software for application and database integration; computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission storage and sharing of data and information; enterprise software in the nature of a database for non-transactional data and a search engine for database content; computer software for optical character recognition; computer software for file sharing between individuals sharing the files; computer programs for searching the contents of computers and computer networks by remote control; computer software for accessing information directories that may be downloaded from the global computer network; computer software to automate data warehousing; computer software for collaboration management, namely for multiple users to work in collaboration and to create, store, publish, and process documents, forms, content and tasksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 27, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance