Drawing for GREEN TRUCK

USPTO serial 78631292

GREEN TRUCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN TRUCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katja Loeffelholz

GREEN TRUCK CELLARS230 PICKWICK DRNAPA, CA 94558UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineABANDONEDMar 10, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance