USPTO serial 78635945
EZY~POD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZY~POD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fullerton, CA
Fullerton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark G Falkin
BAL MARAJ1400 N HARBOR BLVD STE 610FULLERTON, CA 92835-4112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | full line of computer software used for gaming, animations, video displays, video games and interactive computer games; computer game programs and gaming computer software for use with electronic devices, namely, wireless/wired tablet computers, personal digital assistants, laptops, desktops, cellular phones, radio pagers, digital video disc and recorders, digital image processing and play back, digital recording disc featuring animation, text data and movies; computer software used for monitoring and management of digital file servers, for monitoring and management of portable computer devices for games and for monitoring and management of gaming machines; computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |