USPTO serial 78639952
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. McLean, Esq.
Paul A. McLean, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, LLP1900 University Avenue, Fifth FloorEast Palo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Mexican and Hispanic foods, namely, guacamole, processed avocado, namely, avocado pulp, [queso or Hispanic style cheeses, tortilla soup or Mexican style soup,] Mexican dips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 21, 1993 |
| 030 | [Mexican and Hispanic foods, namely, salsas, taquitos, namely, tortillas filled with meat, rolled tacos, tacos, enchiladas, burritos, tortillas, pizza, tortilla chips, picante sauce, hot sauce] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 21, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Apr 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 9, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | โ |
| Jul 5, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Jul 5, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | โ |
| Jul 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jun 19, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | โ |
| Jun 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | โ |
| May 9, 2013 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | โ |
| May 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register โ the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ยฎ symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | โ |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Sep 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |