USPTO serial 78642536
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Washington Group International, Inc.
Boise, ID
Other trademarks owned by Washington Group International, Inc.
Washington Group International, Inc.
Boise, ID
Other trademarks owned by Washington Group International, Inc.
Washington Group International, Inc.
Boise, ID
Other trademarks owned by Washington Group International, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy P. Fraelich
TIMOTHY P FRAELICH JONES DAY901 LAKESIDE AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | News magazines in the field of large scale construction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
| 035 | Business management services in the fields of oil refining, radioactive and hazardous waste processing and mining safety and facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
| 037 | Construction services, namely, construction of military bases, storage facilities, pharmaceutical plants, food and beverage plants, oil refineries, fiber optics cable facilities, electronic chip manufacturing facilities, highways, bridges, rail systems, dams, hydroelectric plants, power generating plants, and chemical agent disposal facilities; waste handling services, namely, collection and removal of radioactive waste; construction planning services in the fields of threat reduction, defense infrastructure, environmental remediation, nuclear processing, power generating, mining, manufacturing facilities, rail systems, highways and bridges, airports, dams, hydroelectric plants, hazardous waste, high hazard facilities, chemical agent disposal and geologic evaluation; and installation of security systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
| 039 | Waste handling services, namely, packaging and storing radioactive waste | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
| 040 | Waste handling services, namely, disposing of toxic chemicals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
| 042 | Engineering services, namely, economic and technical feasibility studies, conceptual and detail design for others of processing facilities, buildings and other structures, in the fields of threat reduction, defense infrastructure, environmental remediation, nuclear processing, power generating, mining, manufacturing facilities, railway systems, highways and bridges, airports, dams, hydroelectric plants, hazardous waste, high hazard facilities, chemical agent disposal and geologic evaluation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
| 045 | Security services, namely, threat simulations, vulnerability analysis and mitigation, emergency and crisis response and deployment of security technology, namely, airborne nuclear, chemical and biological material detectors and unconventional nuclear warfare defense systems; consultation services regarding the safety needs of commercial and industrial companies and government agencies in the fields of oil refining, radioactive and hazardous waste processing and mining | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |