Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78643595?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78643595. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FLUENCY FRAMEWORK?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78643595, the listed owner(s) include: EXECUTIVE CONVERSATION, INC., EXECUTIVE CONVERSATION, INC..

What is USPTO serial number 78643595?

Serial number 78643595 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FLUENCY FRAMEWORK. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of FLUENCY FRAMEWORK?

FLUENCY FRAMEWORK (78643595) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover FLUENCY FRAMEWORK?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78643595

FLUENCY FRAMEWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jun 3, 2005
Status date: Feb 24, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: KEAN, AMY C
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUENCY FRAMEWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK A LAW CORPORATION55 S MARKET ST FL 16SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2324UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Educational services, namely conducting sessions, classes and seminars in person and online in the fields of business management, sales and marketing, customer relationships, public and private sector customer and account development and concerns, financial analysis and accounting techniques, enterprise planning and management, administration, education, business acumen and personal and interpersonal skills, and individual and group tutoring, educational training consultation and training provided in connection therewith; course materials in the nature of computer programs, text books, workbooks, lesson plans, example problems, case studies and business descriptions distributed for use in connection therewith	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 24, 2009	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 24, 2009	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 24, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Feb 24, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 10, 2009	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Oct 1, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 25, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Feb 25, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Aug 23, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Aug 23, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2007	CNFR	SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 22, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 22, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 1, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 1, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 14, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2007	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2006	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Nov 4, 2006	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Nov 4, 2006	EISU	TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED	The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 30, 2006	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jan 26, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jan 20, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 4, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jan 4, 2006	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Jan 4, 2006	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Jan 4, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 30, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 30, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 10, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—