Drawing for ZERO-CLICK

USPTO serial 78646705

ZERO-CLICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZERO-CLICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marina T. Larson

Marina T. Larson Marina Larson & Associates, LLCP.O. Box 4928Dillon, CO 80435-4928UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Disposable test strips for use in conjunction with a meter for electrochemical monitoring of analytes in biological fluids; and disposable test strips for use in conjunction with a meter for electrochemical monitoring of glucose in biological fluidsACTIVE—
010Meter for the medical purpose of electrochemical monitoring of analytes in biological fluids; cutting devices/lancets for acquisition of blood samples for use in electrochemical detection of analytes in blood; meter for the medical purpose of electrochemical monitoring of glucose biological fluids; and cutting devices/lancets for acquisition of blood samples for use in electrochemical detection of glucose in bloodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 4, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 21, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance