USPTO serial 78648563
IPOSTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPOSTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Geriak
JAMES W GERIAK ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP4 PARK PLZ STE 1600IRVINE, CA 92614-2558UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely software for generating and printing information on documents, labels, postage and other products, using digital technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Conversion and transfer of data from one medium to another, namely conversion and transfer of digital data to tangible media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for users to convert and transfer data from one medium to another, namely, convert and transfer digital data to tangible media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |