USPTO serial 78652378
ONECOACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3979207Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONECOACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
CARLSBAD, CA
CARLSBAD, CA
SOLANA BEACH, CA
San Diego, CA
Carlsbad, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca London
5145 Avenida Encinas Suite ACarlsbad, CA 92008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use as a spreadsheet, word processing, database management, all in the field of helping entrepreneurs, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits; cinematographic and television films about helping entrepreneurs, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 016 | Series of books, magazines, information flyers, periodicals, newsletters, newsletters featuring articles, bulletins, instructional manuals, pamphlets, printed correspondence course materials, printed instructional and teaching materials, educational, teaching and training books, memoranda, printed teaching materials, guidebooks and brochures, all in the field of business advice that help entrepreneurs, franchisees, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 038 | Streaming of video material on the Internet; providing on-line bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning business advisory services that help entrepreneurs, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2007 |
| 041 | Meeting arranging; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; providing motivational and educational speakers; educational demonstrations; on-line publication of e-books, e-zines, and newsletters; providing video and audio studios, providing a television program in the field of business advisory services that help entrepreneurs, franchisees, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits via a global computer network; production of recorded television programs; production of television and radio programs; entertainment in the nature of ongoing reality-based television programs; personal coaching in the field of business advisory services that help entrepreneurs, franchisees, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits; and distributing printed materials in connection with all the aforementioned services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software programs for use as a spreadsheet, word processing, database management, in the field of business advisory services that help entrepreneurs, franchisees, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use as a spreadsheet, word processing, client contact, database management, in the field of business advisory services that help entrepreneurs, franchisees, businesses, self-employed individuals, professionals, home-based businesses and direct sale businesses increase revenues and profits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Street Kid, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ONECOACH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ONECOACH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ONECOACH, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Street Kid, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ONECOACH, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONECOACH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |