Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78665976?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78665976. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FIREEXPRESS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78665976, the listed owner(s) include: Symwave, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78665976?

Serial number 78665976 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FIREEXPRESS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover FIREEXPRESS?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78665976

FIREEXPRESS

Q: What is the current status of FIREEXPRESS?

FIREEXPRESS (78665976) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jul 7, 2005
Status date: Apr 23, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: CARROLL, DORITT
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIREEXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Symwave, Inc.
San Diego, CA
Other trademarks owned by Symwave, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl M. Steins

KARL M STEINS STEINS & ASSOCIATES PC2333 CAMINO DEL RIO S STE 120SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-3607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Integrated circuit subsystems for use in circuit assemblies, specifically excluding computer peripherals marketed as consumer products	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 24, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 23, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 22, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Apr 22, 2008	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jan 26, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 19, 2008	PGTT	PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
Jan 7, 2008	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Dec 26, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 26, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2007	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Oct 26, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Mar 2, 2007	PGRR	PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED	—
Feb 26, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 26, 2007	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Feb 13, 2007	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Oct 25, 2006	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Oct 25, 2006	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Aug 25, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 18, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—