USPTO serial 78667182
MIAMI MARLINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIAMI MARLINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Kevlin
MARY L. KEVLIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS, VISORS, KNITTED HEADWEAR, HEADBANDS, BANDANNAS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SWEATERS, TURTLENECKS, PULLOVERS, VESTS, SHORTS, PANTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, OVERALLS, BODYSUITS, BASEBALL UNIFORMS, JERSEYS, WARM-UP SUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, UNDERWEAR, BOXER SHORTS, ROBES, SLEEPWEAR, SWIMWEAR, CLOTHING WRAPS, COATS, JACKETS, PONCHOS, RAINCOATS, CLOTH BIBS, INFANTWEAR, INFANT DIAPER COVERS, CLOTH DIAPER SETS WITH UNDERSHIRT AND DIAPER COVER, JUMPERS, ROMPERS, INFANTS UNDERWEAR, COVERALLS, CREEPERS, BABY BOOTIES, TIES, SUSPENDERS, BELTS, MONEY BELTS, MITTENS, GLOVES, WRISTBANDS, EARMUFFS, SCARVES, FOOTWEAR, SOCKS, HOSIERY, SLIPPERS, APRONS, SLIDING GIRDLES AND HALLOWEEN AND MASQUERADE COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |