USPTO serial 78675135
CERTIFIED ORGANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERTIFIED ORGANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Lovitz, Esq.
MICHAEL L LOVITZ ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Full line of processed foods consisting of meat, poultry, partially cooked or processed vegetables; vegetable salads; potato salads, prepared salads, except macaroni, rice and pasta salads, consisting of protein salads in the nature of chicken salads, ham salads, tuna salads, seafood salads and cheese spread; packaged pre-cut ready to serve vegetable salads and salad kits comprised of processed fruits and vegetables, produce, dressing, cheese and packaged nuts; packaged create-your-own salad kits consisting of processed vegetables, sliced, cubed, shredded, crumbled, diced and/or sliced ham, chicken, turkey, seafood and/or cheese, shredded, chopped, cut, washed and/or trimmed lettuce and vegetables, seeds, nuts, croutons and/or bacon bits and salad dressings; dips; vegetable side dishes; potato-based side dishes; mashed potatoes; a line of refrigerated and frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, meat, poultry | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Line of foods, namely salsa, sauces, marinades, salad dressings; prepared salads, namely, macaroni, pasta and rice; desserts, namely, puddings, gelatins, parfaits and delights; a line of refrigerated and frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta; a line of Mexican food products, namely, burritos, tortillas, salsa, quesadillas, tamales, taquitos; a line of fresh pasta | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reser's Fine Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Reser's Fine Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CERTIFIED ORGANIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |