USPTO serial 78675226
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Navy Exchange Service Command ("NEXCOM")
Virginia Beach, VA
Other trademarks owned by Navy Exchange Service Command ("NEXCOM")
Navy Exchange Service Command ("NEXCOM")
Virginia Beach, VA
Other trademarks owned by Navy Exchange Service Command ("NEXCOM")
Army and Air Force Exchange Service
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Army and Air Force Exchange Service
Army and Air Force Exchange Service
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Army and Air Force Exchange Service
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin (Trey) Llewellyn, III
Edwin (Trey) Llewellyn, III Army and Air Force Exchange Service3911 S. Walton Walker Blvd.Dallas, TX 75236UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Disposable cameras | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2003 |
| 010 | Thermometers for medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2004 |
| 016 | [ Adhesive tapes for stationery or household purposes, adhesive tapes for household gift wrapping purposes, ] disposable diapers, disposable training pants, bathroom tissues, facial tissues, paper towels, paper napkins, plastic trash and yard bags, plastic food storage bags for household use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2002 |
| 017 | [ Adhesive mailing tape for sealing cartons for industrial or commercial use ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2002 |
| 021 | Dental flosses, toothbrushes [ disposable latex gloves for general use, mustache combs ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |