USPTO serial 78675687
DOTTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOTTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Russell Tarleton
E RUSSELL TARLETON SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLL701 5TH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information management services; providing online users with the ability to generate and share information with others in the form of electronic communication and to associate relevant auto-generated and user-selected advertisements with the generated content based on intelligent analysis of the information; providing access to a computer server that enables individual users or groups of users to personalize, annotate, organize, search, and share information with each other in the form of user-generated content and to associate relevant auto-generated and user-selected advertisements with the generated content based on intelligent analysis of the generated content; providing electronic information management services that enable individual users or groups of users to access information on the Internet for the purposes of personalizing, annotating, organizing, searching, and sharing such information with each other and permitted third parties through technology, namely, e-mail, instant messaging systems, mobile devices and other methods that allow such information to be digitally accessible; providing publishers of online content with information management services that enable publishers to select relevant advertisements based on the intelligent analysis of the published content; providing electronic information management services to publishers that enable publishers to advertise related products based on dimensions of the underlying content including rating, URL, keywords, subject and other descriptive elements; providing users of electronic communication services with the ability to develop a constituent component of online user-generated information with associated revenue capacity, namely, electronic advertisements, for the user, provider, and third-party marketers; providing services that enable creating an element of online user-generated information with associated auto-generated and user-selected digital advertisement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |