USPTO serial 78676016
REPRESENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPRESENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Silverman
David M. Silverman Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Suite 800Washington, DC 20006-3401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children, namely, shirts, golf shirts, t shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, sweaters, jerseys, turtle-necks, shorts, sweatpants, warm up suits, jeans, skirts, overalls, vests, jackets, coats, parkas, ponchos, swimwear, bikinis, swim trunks, overcoats, rainwear, wind resistant jackets, sleepwear, robes, undergarments, belts, ties, hats, wool hats, caps, visors, scarves, headbands, wristbands, boxer shorts, pajamas, cloth bibs, socks, hosiery, shoes, boots, sneakers, beach shoes, sandals, slippers, gloves, and suspenders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |