Drawing for ONEMUSICSPOT

USPTO serial 78676087

ONEMUSICSPOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONEMUSICSPOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ

RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQC/O 1-800-4-TRADEMARKP.O. BOX 398538MIAMI BEACH, FL 33239

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Networking referral services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others in the music industry by passing business leads and referrals among group members; Online business directories featuring music companies, music groups, and music artists via communications networksACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users concerning music and the music industry; Electronic transmission of audio and video files via the InternetACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer databases and information featuring audio, video, text, and other multimedia content in the field of music via communication networks; Electronic publishing services, namely, publishing of text, graphic, audio and video works of others via communications networks; Matching users for the transfer of music via communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance