Drawing for COYOTE

USPTO serial 78676102

COYOTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COYOTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S. Gooder

David S. Gooder Brown-Forman Brands4040 Civic Center Dr., Ste. 528San Rafael, CA 94903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Brewed malt-based alcoholic beverages in the nature of beerABANDONED—
033Alcoholic beverages produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 21, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 21, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance