USPTO serial 78676306
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
West Palm Beach, FL
KLINGER ADVANCED AESTHETICS, INC.
NORWALK, CT
KLINGER ADVANCED AESTHETICS, INC.
NORWALK, CT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl M. Zielaznicki
Karl M. Zielaznicki TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPSuite 5200c/o Docketing Dept. 600 Peachtree St. NEAtlanta, GA 30308-2216| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair colorings, color rinses, hair bleaches, color developers, color intensifiers, hair conditioners, hair detanglers, shampoos, hair styling mousse, gel and spray, rouge, hand lotion, hand cream, face lotion, face cream, face powder, lip stick, lip glosses, eye makeup, eye shadow, makeup, pressed powder, blusher, under-eye concealer, loose powder, mascara, eyeliner, lip liner, eye brow pencil, perfume, cologne, suntan oil, nail polish, nail enamel, bath and shower gels and bath salts; toilet soaps; body deodorants; cosmetics, namely, creams, milks, lotions, gels and powders for the face, the body and the hands; sun care preparations, namely, sun block, sun screen, sun creams, sun tan lotion, sun tan gel and sun tan oil; gels, sprays, mousses and balms for the hair styling and hair care; hair lacquers; hair coloring and hair decolorant preparations; permanent waving and curling preparations; essential oils for personal use; dentifrices; nail care preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |