Drawing for SHIPNPAL

USPTO serial 78676683

SHIPNPAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHIPNPAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Bertone

STEVEN M BERTONE PAINE HAMBLEN COFFIN BROOKE & MILLER LLP717 W SPRAGUE AVE STE 1200SPOKANE, WA 99201-3505UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Shipping services; Freight services; Parcel delivery services; Delivery of goods by air, rail, ship or truck; Logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, transportation and delivery of packages and other freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck; Providing services to compare costs of shipping, freight and parcel delivery services and to execute shipping, freight or parcel delivery service transactions by means of telephone or global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 28, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance