Drawing for VERSACHARGER

USPTO serial 78676751

VERSACHARGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERSACHARGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Peloquin, Esq.

MARK S PELOQUIN ESQ PELOQUIN PLLC800 5TH AVE STE 4100SEATTLE, WA 98104-3100UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Handheld pocket-sized device battery charger for cellular telephones and computers, all within the hand-held consumer electronics field limited to marketing over the InternetACTIVESep 16, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 22, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 5, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 8, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 8, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 30, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance