USPTO serial 78676908
INVISAR WHERE INGENUITY AND VISION COMBINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INVISAR WHERE INGENUITY AND VISION COMBINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hillsborough, NC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer based apparatus for designing the layout of electronic circuits; Electronic control systems for machines; Electronic controls for motors; Electronic test and measurement devices for use in the fields of networks and telecommunications, namely, instrumentation used to test and certify new and existing data and voice communication cable and coaxial cable; Factory automation software, namely, software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate production reports; Testing apparatus for testing printed circuit boards | ACTIVE | Oct 8, 2003 |
| 042 | Computer hardware development; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Creation of control programs for automated measurement, assembly, adjustment, and related visualisation; Design and testing for new product development; Design and testing of new products for others; Design of mechanical and micromechanical components; Design of mechanical, electromechanical and optoelectronic apparatus and instruments; Design, development and implementation of software; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Product development; Product development consultation; Product development for others; Product research & development; Research and development for new products for others; Testing or research on machines, apparatus and instruments; Testing, inspection or research of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics or foodstuff | ACTIVE | Oct 8, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |