CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DURIT

USPTO serial 78677834

DURIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

Mark I. Peroff Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tools made of sintered carbide, bide blanks, and sintered carbide blanks, namely, broaches, power-operated reamers, power-operated buffers, cemented carbide cutting tools, chasers, dies for use with machine tools, gear cutters, power-operated grinding wheel, milling cutters, power chippers for metalworking; power-operated drill hammers, collects, air-powered saws, circular saws, table saws, burrs for power tools; thread mills, power-operated grinders; tooling for metal packaging, namely, electro-chemical discharge machine tools for metalworking, grinding tools for grinding machines, machine tools holders, rotary dies for cutting boxes for packaging industry, machine and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, metalworking machine tools, and power-operated powder pressing and tablet compacting toolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance