USPTO serial 78677891
TACMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3392971Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TACMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PINNACLE FRAMES AND ACCENTS, INC.
Austin, TX
PINNACLE FRAMES AND ACCENTS, INC.
Austin, TX
PINNACLE FRAMES AND ACCENTS, INC.
Austin, TX
AUSTIN, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | APPARATUS AND SYSTEM TO ARRANGE OBJECTS FOR VIEWING ONTO A DISPLAY APPARATUS COMPRISED OF PHOTO FRAMES, DECORATIVE WALL HANGINGS, AND FASTENING BRACKETS, BOLTS, HOOKS AND HANGERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PINNACLE FRAMES AND ACCENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PINNACLE FRAMES AND ACCENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PINNACLE FRAMES AND ACCENTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NIELSEN & BAINBRIDGE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TACMAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |