USPTO serial 78677925
EVEREST ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVEREST ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard R. Gans, Esq.
BERNARD R GANS ESQ JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO1900 AVE OF THE STARS FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Consulting services; educational services; executive coaching services; association services; membership services; andorganizing and facilitating groups of business executives who will meet in groups and individually with representatives of the organizer to improve their performance as executives of their businesses and for promoting the interest of business executives by providing a forum for the exchange of ideas, creating a network for advice and support, and by providing educational presentations; and recordings and printed materials related to and directed to the above services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |