Drawing for MAPP MATRIX

USPTO serial 78678207

MAPP MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAPP MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward J. Chalfie

EDWARD J. CHALFIE LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing; textile fabrics for the manufacture of footwear; textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors; knitted fabrics of wool yarn; woven wool textiles; mixed fiber fabricsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
May 31, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 31, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 31, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 9, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2006D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance