Drawing for PEP PREMIER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

USPTO serial 78678710

PEP PREMIER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PEP PREMIER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan M. Kornfield

Susan M. Kornfield Bodman LLP200 S. Division StreetSuite 400Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Online training courses in the field of quality control and quality improvement for auto suppliersABANDONEDApr 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 11, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 11, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 14, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 31, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance